Note: You are reading this message either because your browser is not standards-compliant, or your browser failed to load our css files.

Daily Blog

Pickle Quarterly Numbers In: No Big Surprises

By OTCJournal Editor
November 14, 2008 @ 11:19 am

Spicy Pickle filed its 10Q quarterly financial filing yesterday, and there were no big surprises. Just as I suspected, top line numbers were up quite dramatically on a percentage basis, and the company continued to lose money.

Cash levels at the company are higher than they should be so action needs to be taken to either increase gross profits, lower costs, or raise money. In fact, what is likely to happen is some moderate combination of the three.

Here’s the story. SPKL delivered $1.4 million in revenues for the quarter. That’s up from $261k in the same quarter one year ago, or an increase of 424%. That’s a huge increase. It’s also about $200k higher than the previous quarter.

Losses came in at $1.3 million for the quarter, but as usual a bunch of the loss is paper loss- not cash flow loss. Of greater concern- at the end of the quarter, the company had about $800k left in cash. They really burned through about $1.1 million in the quarter.

In short, they have to slow their burn rate, or they simply won’t be around. Revenues will continue to rise, but expenses have to come down.

They are back on the expansion track now. Two new lease signings recently occurred, and there are a number of others just around the corner. I expect a number of new locations open by end of Q1 ‘09. Their Canadian subsidiary is starting to get traction as well. The September/October economic shock is wearing off, and things are getting back on track.

In the case of Spicy Pickle, the company came into 2008 geared up to open a new location about 3 to 4 times per month. The expansion just wasn’t there, then the recession hit. Now, adjustments need to be made.

Here’s an excerpt from the 10Q I find revealing about their direction:

“Our need to raise additional equity or debt financing and our ability to generate cash flow from operations will depend on our future performance and our ability to successfully implement our stated business and growth strategies. Our results of operations will also be affected by prevailing economic conditions. Many of these factors are beyond our control. If our working capital is insufficient to fund the implementation of our business plan (due to a change in our plans or a material inaccuracy in our assumptions, or as a result of unanticipated expenses, or other unanticipated problems), we will be required to seek additional financing sooner than currently anticipated in order to proceed with such implementation. In the event that we need additional capital and are unable to obtain it, we could be left without sufficient liquidity. We have the ability to reduce our overhead to meet the revenue flow from existing franchised restaurants. We are currently assessing the cuts that may be needed in future periods.”
It’s really a shame they got hit with this recession just as they were gearing up for major expansion. They had sold the franchises, they just needed a little more time.

I suspect the current recession is going to cost the company about a 12 to 18 months to get back on the 2007 growth track. The first half of 2008 they overspent relative to growth. In the second half of 2008 they will downsize considerably. In the first half of ‘09 they will deliver moderate growth, much lower expenses, and perhaps raise some capital. In the second half of 2009 they will get back on track, and become the company I was looking for in 2007.

So- here’s the short version. It’s going to be impossible to predict how the stock will trade for the rest of this year and into 2009. From the second half of 2009 on, it’s going to be a great stock to own. If they really ratchet down expenses, it could go up on that news. Once they accomplish reducing expenses, they will become more of a value play, then go on to become a growth story once again.

That’s how I see it. Of course, it is possible they could close their doors. In my view, not likely as they have recurring revenues, and who would walk away from that?

Comments and questions are welcome.

5 Comments

  1. will this company follow Platina Energy? spkl has limited cash and sell shares for services

    Editor: It’s not a good comparison. SPKL doesn’t sell a commodity that is down to 1/3 from its high. Also, it has not borrowed any money. There is a preferred stock that converts into common stock at $.85. SPKL hasn’t issued any shares since last December. They are simply going to lower their overhead to the point where their cash flow covers expenses. It will be very lean, but necessary to make it through the recession.

    Comment by Anonymous — 12/3/2008 @ 1:48 pm

  2. I worry we will see .10 here. Have been talking to another CEO today - gold stock, great and honest finds, has gone from 1.20 to .05 currently. He told me that this market is worse than 1929. Thus I believe .10 or a marketcap of 5 mill might be an poor option here. Try to get through it with one eye crying. Good luck to all !

    Editor: Could be the case. 2009 is going to be a difficult year for any company that sells anything to US consumers. However, we will get through it, and some companies will come out the other end in good shape.

    Comment by michael williams — 11/21/2008 @ 1:29 pm

  3. I’m thinking of selling my shares any buying cgyv. Hopeing to make up some losses cgyv may be on the way up and I don’t see to much hope for spkl in the near further any thoughts

    Editor: I personally own a lot more SPKL than CGYV, but for the next six months I wish it were the other way. I believe SPKL is going to have to be very prudent in the 2009 with how it manages the company and whatever growth they can put together. CGYV is much better financed, making money, and growing far more rapidly. Futhermore, I believe the emerging markets will come back before the US market- therefore, I’d personally rather have more money in China. That having been said, I own way too much SPKL to make any appreciable sales in this illiquid environment. I believe I will make a lot of money in the stock in one to two years. I own too much of both to make much of a change, so I’ll just stick with what I’ve got. That’s kind of a long answer to a really short question. In answer to your question- I do believe CGYV will appreciate more than SPKL in the next six months and is less risky. After that, it’s too hard to call.

    Comment by Rob — 11/18/2008 @ 6:37 am

  4. Given the track record of the guys running this company, I think there is more reason to keep the faith that they will turn it around than there is concerning a lot of other companies. The big issue is how long will it take given the economic environment.

    Editor: I think the company has going to have to be managed very prudently for all of 2009- at least they need to plan it that way. The stock is another story- I believe it could get legs again in the second half of 2009. Today, I believe there are better stocks to put your money in. However, this one will have its day again.

    Comment by Irvt — 11/17/2008 @ 4:50 pm

  5. Where do you think the cost of an average dinner at SPKL compared with McDonald and with Kentucky Fried Chicken?

    Editor: I don’t know about KFC, but I would say about $2 to $3 higher for lunch than McDonalds. You shouldn’t really look at it as a dinner place. Some of the stores get some dinner traffic, but it’s mostly lunch.

    Comment by Anonymous — 11/16/2008 @ 6:56 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


China Energy Recovery, Inc.
Newsletter
Editions
RSS Subscribe

To subscribe to our newsletter, please enter your email address below.

OTCJ: Chu On This
December 16, 2008

Market Summary
Dow 8742.46 -27.24 (-0.31%)
Nasdaq 1617.01 +0.00 (+0.00%)
Russell 2K 502.01 +0.00 (+0.00%)
S&P 500 909.73 +0.00 (+0.00%)
S&P 100 430.38 +0.00 (+0.00%)
Quotes are delayed 20 minutes.

© 2009 OTC Journal