<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CPNE Rebounding Admirably</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/</link>
	<description>OTC Journal Blog - Small Cap Review, Hot Stocks, Penny Stock Chaser, Small Cap News Release,  College Stock,  Free Trade Picks,  Forex Info News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: crockett</title>
		<link>http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/comment-page-1/#comment-46224</link>
		<dc:creator>crockett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/?p=276#comment-46224</guid>
		<description>geez.. this just cant hold onto any ground... we managed to get to 1.60 with that last news and here we are again in the low 1.40s. It seems the Q4 news (when is that? early Feburary?)is the only thing substantial enough to get a good run going and (most importantly) hold it up there.
Even with all the selling from large stakeholders, these are bargain prices and people should be buying it.
I guess the key word there is SHOULD. CP is getting word out there - tradeshows (good thing) and these Website promotors (sorta good, i guess) - but in the grand scheme thats not exactly national advertising...

sorry for the rant... just frustrated i guess

thanx for the blog here.. very helpful...

Crockett.

&lt;em&gt;Editor: As am I frustrated by the stock&#039;s poor performance relative to the corporate achievements. I think people would buy the heck out of it if the stock could get momentum. Since it can&#039;t, I&#039;m sure there are those who will lose patience and sell. We&#039;ll see what happens from here. The way this stock is trading right now, I would be in a hurry to buy more. I would look for another of those brief sell offs to add to a position. Right now, if one of the sellers chose to simply dump 1/4 million shares, the stock would probably trade down rapidly again.  &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>geez.. this just cant hold onto any ground&#8230; we managed to get to 1.60 with that last news and here we are again in the low 1.40s. It seems the Q4 news (when is that? early Feburary?)is the only thing substantial enough to get a good run going and (most importantly) hold it up there.<br />
Even with all the selling from large stakeholders, these are bargain prices and people should be buying it.<br />
I guess the key word there is SHOULD. CP is getting word out there &#8211; tradeshows (good thing) and these Website promotors (sorta good, i guess) &#8211; but in the grand scheme thats not exactly national advertising&#8230;</p>
<p>sorry for the rant&#8230; just frustrated i guess</p>
<p>thanx for the blog here.. very helpful&#8230;</p>
<p>Crockett.</p>
<p><em>Editor: As am I frustrated by the stock&#8217;s poor performance relative to the corporate achievements. I think people would buy the heck out of it if the stock could get momentum. Since it can&#8217;t, I&#8217;m sure there are those who will lose patience and sell. We&#8217;ll see what happens from here. The way this stock is trading right now, I would be in a hurry to buy more. I would look for another of those brief sell offs to add to a position. Right now, if one of the sellers chose to simply dump 1/4 million shares, the stock would probably trade down rapidly again.  </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/comment-page-1/#comment-46205</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 02:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/?p=276#comment-46205</guid>
		<description>Does Commerce Planet provide mid-quarter updates in terms of both expectations for revenues and earnings for the quarter? If so, when might investors expect one?

&lt;em&gt;Editor: I have suggested to the CEO that they do one, but they have not done one yet. Since it is now pretty far past mid quarter, it seems unlikely they will take my suggestion. Therefore, I wouldn&#039;t expect one at this point. &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Commerce Planet provide mid-quarter updates in terms of both expectations for revenues and earnings for the quarter? If so, when might investors expect one?</p>
<p><em>Editor: I have suggested to the CEO that they do one, but they have not done one yet. Since it is now pretty far past mid quarter, it seems unlikely they will take my suggestion. Therefore, I wouldn&#8217;t expect one at this point. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jr</title>
		<link>http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/comment-page-1/#comment-46072</link>
		<dc:creator>jr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/?p=276#comment-46072</guid>
		<description>the only way this stock will hit two bucks is with a rs-stick a fork in it its done

&lt;em&gt;Editor: You could easily be right about that. This idea may have run its course. I think it&#039;s all about the numbers and time. If Q4 is as good as Q3, and the company continues to grow in Q1, it will inevitably go to $2 and higher. It&#039;s just a question of the market chewing through the excess supply from the early financiers. If the company starts sliding backwards, it&#039;s all over. The only thing I know for sure is that I&#039;ll be around to see which way it comes out. &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only way this stock will hit two bucks is with a rs-stick a fork in it its done</p>
<p><em>Editor: You could easily be right about that. This idea may have run its course. I think it&#8217;s all about the numbers and time. If Q4 is as good as Q3, and the company continues to grow in Q1, it will inevitably go to $2 and higher. It&#8217;s just a question of the market chewing through the excess supply from the early financiers. If the company starts sliding backwards, it&#8217;s all over. The only thing I know for sure is that I&#8217;ll be around to see which way it comes out. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/comment-page-1/#comment-45986</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 14:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/?p=276#comment-45986</guid>
		<description>So Editor,
What are your thoughts on how this quarter is going? Also What are you projecting to happen in 2007? I am seeing good things, maybe I just want to see what others are thinking.

&lt;em&gt;Editor: Tough to say- you have a couple of things going for you, and a couple against you. For example, Q4 is seasonally their worst quarter of the year. During the Holiday season subscribers turn their attention elsewhere. Q1 is seasonally their best quarter. Therefore- I expect them to do extremely well vs Q4 &#039;05. If they can simply match the performance in Q3 &#039;06, I believe that would be huge. It seems to me you have to give them the benefit of the doubt after three quarters of outstanding earnings growth. I&#039;m looking for Q4 to continue to suggest the stock is very undervalued at this $1.50 level. They should kick butt in Q1 &#039;07. The only number I could give you would be a guess at $7 to $8 million, and $3 million in profits once again in Q4. &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Editor,<br />
What are your thoughts on how this quarter is going? Also What are you projecting to happen in 2007? I am seeing good things, maybe I just want to see what others are thinking.</p>
<p><em>Editor: Tough to say- you have a couple of things going for you, and a couple against you. For example, Q4 is seasonally their worst quarter of the year. During the Holiday season subscribers turn their attention elsewhere. Q1 is seasonally their best quarter. Therefore- I expect them to do extremely well vs Q4 &#8217;05. If they can simply match the performance in Q3 &#8217;06, I believe that would be huge. It seems to me you have to give them the benefit of the doubt after three quarters of outstanding earnings growth. I&#8217;m looking for Q4 to continue to suggest the stock is very undervalued at this $1.50 level. They should kick butt in Q1 &#8217;07. The only number I could give you would be a guess at $7 to $8 million, and $3 million in profits once again in Q4. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crockett</title>
		<link>http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/comment-page-1/#comment-45977</link>
		<dc:creator>crockett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/?p=276#comment-45977</guid>
		<description>so if finally made it to 1.48-1.50 range again.
Just wondering... it was a little longer than 8 trading days but does your &quot;Dinapoli 3×3&quot; scenario still hold true?

Glad to see this turnaround... a loooong time coming...

Crockett

&lt;em&gt;Editor: The Dinapoli 3x3 was breached back when the stock traded above $1.33- it&#039;s trading nicely above that level right now, which is bullish. The next interesting level is $1.55-That&#039;s the downtrend line drawn across the tops from the October high of $1.80. If it can get above that level, it could still bring $2 into the crosshairs.  The problem here continues to be supply from the old financiers. They appear to be pigs. If they would simply leave it alone I bet it would head to $2 in short order. If you&#039;re a buyer, it&#039;s heaven sent. If you&#039;re looking for a better valuation like me, it&#039;s a nightmare.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so if finally made it to 1.48-1.50 range again.<br />
Just wondering&#8230; it was a little longer than 8 trading days but does your &#8220;Dinapoli 3×3&#8243; scenario still hold true?</p>
<p>Glad to see this turnaround&#8230; a loooong time coming&#8230;</p>
<p>Crockett</p>
<p><em>Editor: The Dinapoli 3&#215;3 was breached back when the stock traded above $1.33- it&#8217;s trading nicely above that level right now, which is bullish. The next interesting level is $1.55-That&#8217;s the downtrend line drawn across the tops from the October high of $1.80. If it can get above that level, it could still bring $2 into the crosshairs.  The problem here continues to be supply from the old financiers. They appear to be pigs. If they would simply leave it alone I bet it would head to $2 in short order. If you&#8217;re a buyer, it&#8217;s heaven sent. If you&#8217;re looking for a better valuation like me, it&#8217;s a nightmare.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin kraslen</title>
		<link>http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/comment-page-1/#comment-45962</link>
		<dc:creator>martin kraslen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/?p=276#comment-45962</guid>
		<description>To change subject,
Don&#039;t FMLY you do remember that one don&#039;t you? anyway, don&#039;t they have a hand in the release of the new Rocky film?

&lt;em&gt;Editor: Just for future reference, this section is for comments on CPNE- answer to your question- no- they were involved in a &quot;Rambo&quot;- I don&#039;t know where that one is. &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To change subject,<br />
Don&#8217;t FMLY you do remember that one don&#8217;t you? anyway, don&#8217;t they have a hand in the release of the new Rocky film?</p>
<p><em>Editor: Just for future reference, this section is for comments on CPNE- answer to your question- no- they were involved in a &#8220;Rambo&#8221;- I don&#8217;t know where that one is. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/comment-page-1/#comment-45852</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/?p=276#comment-45852</guid>
		<description>Last quarters earnings demonstrated spectacular growth but the stock didn&#039;t respond as favorably as one might have expected. (The price rose and then sold off). In your opinion, what kind of news would make this stock take off? What are investors waiting for?

&lt;em&gt;Editor: I believe the company simply needs to get its story out to a wider audience which now needs to include institutional investors. Clearly, between $1.50 and $2, there is supply. It&#039;s market does not have enough volume to handle the supply at this time. If they continue to deliver the numbers as they have over the last 3 quarters, it is inevitable the institutional markets will &quot;discover&quot; this company. A couple more quarters of $3 million in profits, and someone will just buy the company for the cash alone. Another possibility- if the stock starts behaving better, momentum traders will come back in and bid it up. The company has some plans to start getting its story out to a wider audience.  &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last quarters earnings demonstrated spectacular growth but the stock didn&#8217;t respond as favorably as one might have expected. (The price rose and then sold off). In your opinion, what kind of news would make this stock take off? What are investors waiting for?</p>
<p><em>Editor: I believe the company simply needs to get its story out to a wider audience which now needs to include institutional investors. Clearly, between $1.50 and $2, there is supply. It&#8217;s market does not have enough volume to handle the supply at this time. If they continue to deliver the numbers as they have over the last 3 quarters, it is inevitable the institutional markets will &#8220;discover&#8221; this company. A couple more quarters of $3 million in profits, and someone will just buy the company for the cash alone. Another possibility- if the stock starts behaving better, momentum traders will come back in and bid it up. The company has some plans to start getting its story out to a wider audience.  </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/comment-page-1/#comment-45851</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/?p=276#comment-45851</guid>
		<description>Can you provide us with an updated technical analysis of the stock price similar to the one provided on November 11th. Is $1.00 still viewed as technical support, or has the technical support price risen given buyers seemed to appear at the $1.18 level? A bullish sign?

&lt;em&gt;Editor: I believe a technical look at the stock is in order. I will post a new BLOG with a chart in the next day or two. Thanks for the suggestion. &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide us with an updated technical analysis of the stock price similar to the one provided on November 11th. Is $1.00 still viewed as technical support, or has the technical support price risen given buyers seemed to appear at the $1.18 level? A bullish sign?</p>
<p><em>Editor: I believe a technical look at the stock is in order. I will post a new BLOG with a chart in the next day or two. Thanks for the suggestion. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/comment-page-1/#comment-45784</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 00:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/?p=276#comment-45784</guid>
		<description>I notice that Yahoo&#039;s Finance website does not have a full year chart available for this particular stock. Can you recommend another website that would allow me to view a full year candlestick chart for Commerce Planet. Thanks!

&lt;em&gt;Editor: That is kind of strange- they only have a 5 day chart. WWW.Bigcharts.com is a very good resource for free charts. Here&#039;s a link to the one year version: &lt;a href=&quot;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=cpne&amp;sid=0&amp;o_symb=cpne&amp;x=0&amp;y=0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=cpne&amp;sid=0&amp;o_symb=cpne&amp;x=0&amp;y=0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;The one year chart is fairly compelling. It shows a stock that has done very well and is simply in a consolidation phase. &lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice that Yahoo&#8217;s Finance website does not have a full year chart available for this particular stock. Can you recommend another website that would allow me to view a full year candlestick chart for Commerce Planet. Thanks!</p>
<p><em>Editor: That is kind of strange- they only have a 5 day chart. <a href="http://WWW.Bigcharts.com" rel="nofollow">http://WWW.Bigcharts.com</a> is a very good resource for free charts. Here&#8217;s a link to the one year version: <a href="http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=cpne&#038;sid=0&#038;o_symb=cpne&#038;x=0&#038;y=0" rel="nofollow">http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=cpne&#038;sid=0&#038;o_symb=cpne&#038;x=0&#038;y=0</a></em></p>
<p><em>The one year chart is fairly compelling. It shows a stock that has done very well and is simply in a consolidation phase. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/cpne-rebounding-admirably/276/comment-page-1/#comment-45705</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 20:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/?p=276#comment-45705</guid>
		<description>Another view re early investor selling:

-- these investor&#039;s business model is to invest in startups and help guide them to profitability
-- they have achieved their goals with CPNE and are no longer on the board
-- they likely need to cycle capital into other projects that fit their business model
-- they have already made plenty on their investment
-- they are not necessarily selling all of their shares, they may be keeping some invested which would be a sign of confidence

Given that CPNE growth is sustained over 3 quarters (and looking good for the 4th quarter), is it really likely that they are hiding fundamental problems? Seems like the problems would have showed up by now. The selling creates problems for the PPS, but doesn&#039;t necessarily reflect on the company&#039;s fundamentals.

&lt;em&gt;Editor: Dear Don: You have summed it up perfectly. I will probably use your observations in a future edition. People are making a lot of this insider selling, but as you point out, the early shareholders who took a lot of risk are simply doing what early shareholders do. There is nothing wrong or negative about this company we can learn from early shareholders selling. The issue is simple- can they sustain the current financial performance?, and can it continue to grow?- if so, this one will trade much higher at some point in the future. My concern is that this company is a &quot;flash in the pan&quot; and won&#039;t be able to sustain this level of performance. BrandPartners comes to mind- that company had a couple of great quarters, the market loved it, then it completely bombed. However, in the case of BPTR, a lot of their earnings for a couple of quarters related to negotiated forgiveness of debt- CPNE on the other hand is simply generating tons of excess cash. That is powerful. A couple more quarters of performance equivalent to Q3 should put this stock much higher. We don&#039;t see the next hard numbers until the end of March. That could be a problem for the stock. Q4 is seasonally the slowest- Q1 is seasonally the best. I believe the tale will be told by mid May, which is when we will see Q1 numbers- that would be a solid year of earnings. $5 is not unrealistic if they can keep growing. $.50 is not unrealistic if they go the other way. So far, I believe the company has earned loyalty until proven otherwise. You won&#039;t find a better speculative idea in the microcap world.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another view re early investor selling:</p>
<p>&#8211; these investor&#8217;s business model is to invest in startups and help guide them to profitability<br />
&#8211; they have achieved their goals with CPNE and are no longer on the board<br />
&#8211; they likely need to cycle capital into other projects that fit their business model<br />
&#8211; they have already made plenty on their investment<br />
&#8211; they are not necessarily selling all of their shares, they may be keeping some invested which would be a sign of confidence</p>
<p>Given that CPNE growth is sustained over 3 quarters (and looking good for the 4th quarter), is it really likely that they are hiding fundamental problems? Seems like the problems would have showed up by now. The selling creates problems for the PPS, but doesn&#8217;t necessarily reflect on the company&#8217;s fundamentals.</p>
<p><em>Editor: Dear Don: You have summed it up perfectly. I will probably use your observations in a future edition. People are making a lot of this insider selling, but as you point out, the early shareholders who took a lot of risk are simply doing what early shareholders do. There is nothing wrong or negative about this company we can learn from early shareholders selling. The issue is simple- can they sustain the current financial performance?, and can it continue to grow?- if so, this one will trade much higher at some point in the future. My concern is that this company is a &#8220;flash in the pan&#8221; and won&#8217;t be able to sustain this level of performance. BrandPartners comes to mind- that company had a couple of great quarters, the market loved it, then it completely bombed. However, in the case of BPTR, a lot of their earnings for a couple of quarters related to negotiated forgiveness of debt- CPNE on the other hand is simply generating tons of excess cash. That is powerful. A couple more quarters of performance equivalent to Q3 should put this stock much higher. We don&#8217;t see the next hard numbers until the end of March. That could be a problem for the stock. Q4 is seasonally the slowest- Q1 is seasonally the best. I believe the tale will be told by mid May, which is when we will see Q1 numbers- that would be a solid year of earnings. $5 is not unrealistic if they can keep growing. $.50 is not unrealistic if they go the other way. So far, I believe the company has earned loyalty until proven otherwise. You won&#8217;t find a better speculative idea in the microcap world.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

