Comments on: China Energy: In the Middle of $3.4 Billion in Spending http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/ OTC Journal Blog - Small Cap Review, Hot Stocks, Penny Stock Chaser, Small Cap News Release, College Stock, Free Trade Picks, Forex Info News Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:20:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: JD http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/comment-page-1/#comment-140893 JD Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:48:55 +0000 http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/#comment-140893 Why hasn't CGYV posted its' 2cd quarter earnings yet. <em>Editor: Sorry- it had-I'm sure you're up to date now. $7.5 million EPS .03 </em> <input type="hidden" id="gwProxy" /><!--Session data--><input type="hidden" id="jsProxy" onclick="jsCall();" /> <div id="refHTML" /> Why hasn’t CGYV posted its’ 2cd quarter earnings yet.

Editor: Sorry- it had-I’m sure you’re up to date now. $7.5 million EPS .03


]]> By: Stan http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/comment-page-1/#comment-138381 Stan Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:27:27 +0000 http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/#comment-138381 Do you see the recent trading of China Energy a result of their 1st quarter numbers or do you see this as an opportunity to add more at this level, 1.50's? Thanks <em>Editor: everyone seems to be bashing me over this stock, but that's a bit silly. Let's just look at one fact. A Hong Kong based fund just invested $5 million in the company in a convertible security with a $1.80 conversion price. It has a 9% coupon. They did extensive due diligence, and clearly invested because they think they can make money at a $1.80 cost basis. That pretty much says it all, and some pretty smart guys wrote the $5 million check.</em> Do you see the recent trading of China Energy a result of their 1st quarter numbers or do you see this as an opportunity to add more at this level, 1.50′s?
Thanks

Editor: everyone seems to be bashing me over this stock, but that’s a bit silly. Let’s just look at one fact. A Hong Kong based fund just invested $5 million in the company in a convertible security with a $1.80 conversion price. It has a 9% coupon. They did extensive due diligence, and clearly invested because they think they can make money at a $1.80 cost basis. That pretty much says it all, and some pretty smart guys wrote the $5 million check.

]]> By: Don http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/comment-page-1/#comment-138211 Don Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:10:06 +0000 http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/#comment-138211 Mr. Anonymous sounds like he's about 12 years old, maybe his mom will take away his computer soon. Any competent company having to do with China and energy is an historic opportunity, CGYV is on a great path. Glad to hear you have a new China/energy idea on the way, how will it compare to CGYV? <em>Editor: By now you probably know it is NFES at about $.80 with $.10 in trailing EPS- probably $.15 this year to $.20. Judge for yourself. Great value in my view. Better margin, and less "big project" oriented. More consistent quarter to quarter. </em> Mr. Anonymous sounds like he’s about 12 years old, maybe his mom will take away his computer soon. Any competent company having to do with China and energy is an historic opportunity, CGYV is on a great path. Glad to hear you have a new China/energy idea on the way, how will it compare to CGYV?

Editor: By now you probably know it is NFES at about $.80 with $.10 in trailing EPS- probably $.15 this year to $.20. Judge for yourself. Great value in my view. Better margin, and less “big project” oriented. More consistent quarter to quarter.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/comment-page-1/#comment-138208 Anonymous Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:49:44 +0000 http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/#comment-138208 China's economy stabilizing; export orders tick upAsian This could be the Asian century, just as the twentieth century was the American century”. Markets Rally on Chinese Manufacturing cgyv still going dowm nowhere near 2.00 and you pick it at 3.40 so tell me again how well this is doing China market up cgyv down <em>Editor: I also picked FXI at $25- not mentioning that. It will have it's day. Lousy first quarter derailed the stock in my view. </em> China’s economy stabilizing; export orders tick upAsian This could be the Asian century, just as the twentieth century was the American century”. Markets Rally on Chinese Manufacturing cgyv still going dowm nowhere near 2.00 and you pick it at 3.40 so tell me again how well this is doing China market up cgyv down

Editor: I also picked FXI at $25- not mentioning that. It will have it’s day. Lousy first quarter derailed the stock in my view.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/comment-page-1/#comment-138147 Anonymous Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:29:39 +0000 http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/#comment-138147 <em>again nobody case about China. We owe them so much money we are just trying to keep them happy </em> <strong>Editor's response: </strong>Again, you're an idiot. again nobody case about China. We owe them so much money we are just trying to keep them happy

Editor’s response: Again, you’re an idiot.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/comment-page-1/#comment-138144 Anonymous Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:40:23 +0000 http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/#comment-138144 are we getting closer to 2.00 or still going down lok at the chart still going down <em>Editor: Chart doesn't look good for a breakout right now. Long term investors only at this time. </em> are we getting closer to 2.00 or still going down lok at the chart still going down

Editor: Chart doesn’t look good for a breakout right now. Long term investors only at this time.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/comment-page-1/#comment-138051 Anonymous Fri, 29 May 2009 17:35:52 +0000 http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/#comment-138051 <em>…WHY do you think no more volume will come? reason # 3 no cares about China more to come </em> <strong>Editor's response:</strong> Seriously? Nobody cares about China? China's the story of the decade. It's only making the front page of every major financial publication on a regular basis now. I was willing to entertain an intelligent argument with you, but now you're just grasping at straws.... an indication of how desperate you are. Keep swinging though. By the way, here's how much the world doesn't care about China.... http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aIb300W_fCyw&refer=home http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE55014920090601 http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/asian-markets-rally-on-chinese-manufacturing/ http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/05/31/Chinese-economists-see-risks-in-US-debt/UPI-49801243822422/ http://www.dailymirror.lk/DM_BLOG/Sections/frmNewsDetailView.aspx?ARTID=50518 All the headlines were made in just the last three hours. I wonder what the news lansscape would look like if people did care about China. …WHY do you think no more volume will come? reason # 3 no cares about China more to come

Editor’s response: Seriously? Nobody cares about China? China’s the story of the decade. It’s only making the front page of every major financial publication on a regular basis now.

I was willing to entertain an intelligent argument with you, but now you’re just grasping at straws…. an indication of how desperate you are. Keep swinging though.

By the way, here’s how much the world doesn’t care about China….

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aIb300W_fCyw&refer=home

http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE55014920090601

http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/asian-markets-rally-on-chinese-manufacturing/

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2009/05/31/Chinese-economists-see-risks-in-US-debt/UPI-49801243822422/

http://www.dailymirror.lk/DM_BLOG/Sections/frmNewsDetailView.aspx?ARTID=50518

All the headlines were made in just the last three hours. I wonder what the news lansscape would look like if people did care about China.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/comment-page-1/#comment-138049 Anonymous Fri, 29 May 2009 16:41:12 +0000 http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/#comment-138049 rationale reason why CGYV won’t be a $2.00 stock reason # 2 what happens when China backs N Korea? and it is more likely to happen before this gets to 2.00 <em>Editor: We'll have our day with this one soon. </em> rationale reason why CGYV won’t be a $2.00 stock reason # 2 what happens when China backs N Korea? and it is more likely to happen before this gets to 2.00

Editor: We’ll have our day with this one soon.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/comment-page-1/#comment-138007 Anonymous Thu, 28 May 2009 20:06:43 +0000 http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/#comment-138007 <em>rationale reason why CGYV won’t be a $2.00 stock reason #1 no volume more to come </em> <strong>Editor's response: </strong>OK, you're getting there, but your argument is still weak......<em>WHY </em>do you think no more volume will come? Keep trying. By the way, I'm not going to post your other CGYV comments that say slightly different things but work towards the same result (to push the stock lower).... there's no need to foster redundancy. You may be trying to make it appear as if there are several different commenters all thinking the same thing, but we know it's you, over, and, over, and over. It's just a lot more efficient if you compact your comments into one entry. rationale reason why CGYV won’t be a $2.00 stock reason #1 no volume more to come

Editor’s response: OK, you’re getting there, but your argument is still weak……WHY do you think no more volume will come? Keep trying.

By the way, I’m not going to post your other CGYV comments that say slightly different things but work towards the same result (to push the stock lower)…. there’s no need to foster redundancy. You may be trying to make it appear as if there are several different commenters all thinking the same thing, but we know it’s you, over, and, over, and over. It’s just a lot more efficient if you compact your comments into one entry.

]]> By: RBM http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/comment-page-1/#comment-137929 RBM Tue, 26 May 2009 20:31:31 +0000 http://www.otcjournal.com/otcb/china-energy-in-the-middle-of-34-billion-in-spending/981/#comment-137929 <em>Any concern on the news today about their financing transaction of $5 million? </em> <strong>Editor's response:</strong> Concern? None at all.... more like excitement. Though we - in general - try to steer clear of dilution because it's just a lifeline in most cases, China Energy's a different beast. The company makes good use of their money, as they did in early 2008 (which is really what put the company on the map). I'm confident the ROI on this $5 million will be worth many times that 12 months from now, which is what hold sCGYV apart.... the ROI on every dollar they get. Any concern on the news today about their financing transaction of $5 million?

Editor’s response: Concern? None at all…. more like excitement. Though we – in general – try to steer clear of dilution because it’s just a lifeline in most cases, China Energy’s a different beast. The company makes good use of their money, as they did in early 2008 (which is really what put the company on the map). I’m confident the ROI on this $5 million will be worth many times that 12 months from now, which is what hold sCGYV apart…. the ROI on every dollar they get.

]]>