 |
 |
December
11, 2003 |
 |
|
 |
Volume
VI, Issue 124 |
 |
|
Email : info@otcjournal.com
URL : http://www.otcjournal.com
To
OTC Journal Members:
|
Don't Forget to Become a
Preferred Member
Don't forget to subscribe to the
free preferred member list, simply click
here. You will receive an email confirmation.
Then simply hit REPLY and SEND. You will be included in the Preferred
Members list. You only need to do this once.
Or, to subscribe by email, send
a blank email to otcjournal-preferred-subscribe@lyris.otcjournal.com.
If there is any problem, you can
always go to http://www.otcjournal.com/pref-sub.html
and submit your email address.
For those of you who are wondering;
it's free and we have no plans at this time to charge preferred membership.
|
 |
Coming
Attraction |
 |
Successful microcap investing can
be as much about understanding yourself as picking the right stocks. Microcap
investing is an emotional process. Very few people invest in microcap stocks
for any clinical reason- the stocks don't lend themselves to Wall Street
coverage or institutional participation.
Understanding your own psychological
profile when making a microcap investment can be one of the most critical
components in successful microcap investing.
This weekend I am going to publish
a special article from our contributing editor, Dr. Richard Geist.
Dick is a Harvard Ph.D. in psychology, and is considered by many to be
the foremost expert on the psychology of investing. Stay tuned.
 |
It's The Economy
Stupid, Part II |
|
There is enormous debate about the
market and the economy. Corporate profits are climbing rapidly, gold continues
making new highs, and the dollar continues falling. The talking heads on
CNBC are now trumpeting the likely hood inflation will return. Weren't
we hearing about deflation just a few months ago?
I believe the only real risk for
stocks right now is increasing interest rates, barring any major geopolitical
catastrophic event. It's a simple concept most people fail to grasp- When
interest rates are higher, earning are worth less in the eyes of the market.
This simple fact explains why the morons who believe the market needs to
drop to a PE of 8 before the Bull can come back are simply wrong. The Bull
is back, and the PE did not drop to 8. Past bears dropped this low, but
in high interest rate environments with less complex accounting methods.
Interest rates have already started
going up, driven by market forces, not FED action. However, this implies
growth has returned, which is good for stocks. I believe stocks will continue
to appreciate for some time even as interest rates increase moderately.
The rate of appreciation for stocks could slow.
How do you think this chart of the
NASDAQ might have looked if we hadn't had 911, Enronitis, an war with Iraq?
I believe the NASDAQ has a shot for a return to the 3200 level over the
next 18 months.
I have been reading a number of predictions
stating our market will mirror the Nikei in 1993/1994, which I believe
is wrong. One of the many newsletters I read is The Agile Trader (www.theagiletrader.com),
by Adam Olensis. This guy is brilliant, and highly technical. He
is one of the few technicians that is not married to his beliefs, then
finds the data to support them. He clinically dissects what is happening.
Last weekend he published a beautiful
overview of the debate on the economy. Here is an except from that newsletter
which I believe puts in all in perspective.
|
Excerpt From December 7 Edition
of the Closing Bell, By Adam Olensis
Given that the US economy is growing
at about 4½ times the rate of the Japanese economy over the past
9 years, it would be difficult to imagine that the apparent correlations
in the Nikkei and Nasdaq are anything but episodic and anecdotal.
Now, one other interesting point
may be made about the difference between the way the US economy is responding
in its post-bubble era and the way the Japanese economy has responded.
Basically the US government has begged, borrowed, and bought this 3.4%
growth, leveraging its capacity to stimulate the economy by lowering taxes,
by massively lowering interest rates, by electronically "printing" money,
by borrowing money from bond buyers, and by spending oodles more than it
collects in tax revenue (growing the deficit). It's a little a little bit
like the way Cisco (CSCO) used to buy its growth by acquiring small companies
and writing off the acquisitions in that the government has assumed debt,
pumped the proceeds into the economy and called it growth, extracting the
money from the "debt pocket" and putting into the "GDP pocket."
Of course the big question is
whether this leveraging of debt is a zero-sum game, a less-than zero-sum
game, or an effective counter-cyclical strategy that will smooth the amplitude
and widen the frequency of the business cycle, and ultimately make the
US economy a more valuable going concern (less cyclicality in any "asset"
makes it more valuable).
Whatever the correct answer is
to the tripartite question above, it will look different than do the Japanese
economy and the Nikkei. Either the counter-cyclical stimuli will work or
they won't. But the results will almost certainly be patently different
from what happened in Japan, and consequently the relative progressions
of the stock markets are most likely to look quite different. In fact,
I would suggest, the LEAST likely scenario would be for the US markets
to trace out paths similar to the one traced out by the Japanese market.
Our demographics are different (US population is growing where the Japanese
population stagnated), we have vastly more immigration, our country's racial
makeup is quickly transforming itself, and the two countries' histories
just prior to their bubbles were markedly different (Japan was a newly
minted, post-WWII juggernaut overlaid onto a culture that still bore the
earmarks of a feudal society, forced onto the launching pad by foreign
(US) stimulus after the war.) Furthermore, and perhaps most importantly,
the current aggressive countercyclical stimuli proffered by Greenspan et
al are explicitly designed to AVOID just the fate that befell Japan.
So, what should we provisionally
conclude? The Greenspan Gambit is working in the short run. We do not yet
know whether it will work in the long run. If it is going to work, then
the US economy will grow itself out from under the giant debt load assumed
to counteract the post-bubble stagnation. If it is not going to work, we
probably won't know that for some time. Which is to say that the stimuli
in the system still have some more room/time to play themselves through.
And (in the "failure" scenario) the current strong growth path in the economy
will then turn down...but down with an even larger debt load on its back,
which will accelerate its decline to an even lower low. (Just like stocks,
larger return implies higher beta.)
Bottom Line: In my opinion this
market will tend to work itself higher as earnings and the economic statistics
continue to reflect the effects of stimuli in the system. And it will probably
be mid-to-late '04 before we start getting clear on whether the economy
has been on a stimulus-induced high from which it will crash like a crack
addict, or whether it has ingested a healthier kind of "nutritional support"
that has helped it to heal itself.
President Bush's re-election hopes
are very likely to hinge on just this issue. So we can bet that the pedal
will be to the stimulus metal into at least 3Q04..
|
In my opinion, this piece of work
is brilliant, and I had to share it with you.
The market is now grinding sideways.
It is estimated $3 to $5 billion in stock sales are hitting
the market everyday to meet mutual fund redemptions as investors flee from
their corrupt mutual funds. This spells opportunity for those on the long
side.
Charts Provided Courtesy
Of TradePortal.com |
|
| The OTCjournal.com Newsletter is
an independent electronic publication committed to providing our readers
with factual information on selected publicly traded companies. All
companies are chosen on the basis of certain financial analysis and other
pertinent criteria with a view toward maximizing the upside potential
for investors while minimizing the downside risk, whenever possible.
Moreover, as detailed below, this publication accepts compensation from
certain of the companies which it features. Likewise, this newsletter
is owned by MarketByte, LLC. To the degrees enumerated herein,
this newsletter should not be regarded as an independent publication.
Click
Here to view our compensation on every company we have ever covered,
or visit the following web address: http://www.otcjournal.com/disclaimer.html
for our full profiles and http://www.otcjournal.com/trading-alerts/disclaimer.html
for Trading Alerts.
All statements and expressions are
the sole opinions of the editors and are subject to change without
notice. A profile, description, or other mention of a company in the newsletter
is neither an offer nor solicitation to buy or sell any securities
mentioned. While we believe all sources of information to be factual and
reliable, in no way do we represent or guarantee the accuracy thereof,
nor the statements made herein.
The editor, members of the editor's
family, and/or entities with which they are affiliated, are forbidden by
company policy to own, buy, sell or otherwise trade stock for their own
benefit in the companies who appear in the publication unless specifically
disclosed in the newsletter.
The profiles, critiques, and other
editorial content of the OTCjournal.com may contain forward-looking statements
relating to the expected capabilities of the companies mentioned herein.
THE READER SHOULD VERIFY ALL CLAIMS
AND DO THEIR OWN DUE DILIGENCE BEFORE INVESTING IN ANY SECURITIES MENTIONED.
INVESTING IN SECURITIES IS SPECULATIVE AND CARRIES A HIGH DEGREE
OF RISK. THE INFORMATION FOUND IN THIS PROFILE IS PROTECTED BY THE COPYRIGHT
LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND MAY NOT BE COPIED, OR REPRODUCED IN ANY WAY
WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED, WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE EDITORS OF OTCjournal.com.
We encourage our readers to invest
carefully and read the investor information available at the web sites
of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") at http://www.sec.govand/or
the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") at http://www.nasd.com.
We also strongly recommend that you read the SEC advisory to investors
concerning Internet Stock Fraud, which can be found at http://www.sec.gov/consumer/cyberfr.htm.
Disclaimer ID:$subst('Recip.userid') Readers can review all public filings
by companies at the SEC's EDGAR page. The NASD has published information
on how to invest carefully at its web site.
You
can unsubscribe from this list at any time by
Clicking
Here and HITTING SEND. If you are having difficulty removing
yourself or wish to change your address please go to http://listserv.otcjournal.com/opt.cgi?. |
|
|
|
Click Here to View the OTC Journal Disclosure
|
|
To subscribe to our newsletter, please enter your email address below.
Quotes are delayed 20 minutes.

|